It’s just a different art direction. FC6 is most definitely more technically impressive than FC5, just they went for a more naturalistic color palette for 5 and a more “postcard” vibe for 6. I agree with OP. Graphically farcry 5 looked better IMO. But I do like the farcry 6 location and story much better. 5 Younger Content Rating than Far Cry 6. If Far Cry 6 is not age appropriate for your child, here are similar games ordered by age rating so you can find an age-appropriate alternative that’s also a game they will love. Lego City: Undercover. Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora. Far Cry 2. My Review of Far Cry 6 so Far. Far Cry 6. These are my thoughts on the game so far: Story- So far the story has been fantastic in my opinion, better than Far Cry 5, on par with 4. This game is much longer to beat than 5, and has good progression. I also think the villain in this game is definitely more interesting than the last game. Far Cry: New Dawn is exactly like that. Well, you can hide the enemy's health bar and damage counter if you want but they are nonetheless bullet sponges if you neglect your weapon upgrades/weapon levels. If the upgrade level is the same as the enemy level, then it plays just like any other Far Cry. While I'm not a big fan of the system in I find Far Cry 5 (on ps4) a tad wonky. Aiming is VERY tricky with the pistol. I’ve only used a few other guns and they seem more predictable. This game, however, lets and encourages you to play more stealth like and with melee. There are ways to go gun ho, but ammo is a valuable resource, at least in the beginning. Far Cry 4 is better than 5. Far Cry 4. It’s infinitely more interesting and beautiful. I like FC5 but almost everything in 4 was better. The forts were more memorable, the characters were more charismatic, especially Pagan vs The Father, the premise made more sense and the story was easier to follow. Again don’t get me wrong, Far Cry 5 is 2AZQpsX. Hunting went out the window. The game is a mix of the recent ACs, Ghost Recon and well Far Cry. Jack of all trades, master of none. But most importantly the gameplay took an big nosedive due to Ubisoft's obsession for RPG mechanics that have nothing to do in a game like Far Cry. Here a non exhaustive list: 2. CapitalEcho • 2 yr. ago. After playing 6 it's hard to go back to 5 gameplay-wise, 6 is pretty much an improvement of 5 in every way except for the ammo system, but even that can be bypassed with AP rounds. 5 however has a much better story and soundtrack. They honestly feel like two sides of the same coin, the faults of FC5 are fixed in 6 Far cry 2 was very well done but some mechanics sucked making the whole experience worse for me. (i.e hand map) . Far cry1 is bood but very different from the rest of the series. Far Cry 5 and 6 seems extremely rushed. Am not sure why. It just feels that the cast was huge with no personality. +Far cry 5 protagonist had no voice (LMAO) I think Metro beats Far Cry 5 in every department. Better story, Better graphics, Better soundtrack and Better gunplay though ,atleast when i played it on PS4, the controls felt abit janky but i guess that's because the guns feel like they actually have weight. The only thing Far Cry 5, has over Metro is size. My Review of Far Cry 6 so Far. Far Cry 6. These are my thoughts on the game so far: Story- So far the story has been fantastic in my opinion, better than Far Cry 5, on par with 4. This game is much longer to beat than 5, and has good progression. I also think the villain in this game is definitely more interesting than the last game. The overall design of Far Cry 6 is okay but it’s nothing new to the video industry. Tropical islands have been done before and better. The graphics don’t help sell the many islands of Yara

is far cry 6 better than far cry 5