I had to because I needed VR and got the Tamron 70-200/2.8 VC to replace it. Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 I've heard that the 80-200 AF-S had some focus motor issues. I'd probably skip it and look elsewhere. If you need f/2.8 and don't want to pay Nikon 70-200/2.8 prices, then seriously consider the Tamron 70-200/2.8 VC G2. Nikon 70-300mm VR. OVERALL. It performs better than any of the previous 70-300mm lenses. This is the lens to get if your subjects hold still. If you need to shoot moving things in lower light, get the faster 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-D instead. If size, weight and cost are no object (they are for me), get the 70-200mm VR or 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II. Features. Compact high-performance 2.9x Full Frame/FX-Format telephoto zoom lens with an f/4 fixed aperture and Nikon's third-generation Vibration Reduction (VR). Capture high performance stills and HD videos with a classic 70-200mm angle of view (105-300mm on APS-C size/DX-Format cameras). An essential lens for low light or fast action sequences. Nikkor 24-70mm f/2.8E; Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR Lens Review; 200-400mm II; 200-500mm f/5.6; Teleconverters for Nikon Lenses weight; included HB-48 The 70-200mm is a no-brainer for sports. Although it is nice to have a second body with a wide lens, that camera spends 98% of the event unused, while the workhorse does its thing. The 70-200mm is a mainstay for sports photography. Being able to quickly zoom out to 70mm allowed me to grab this shot. Công nghệ chống rung VR II. Hệ thống chống rung VR II (Vibration Reduction) của Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Nano giúp giảm thiểu hiện tượng nhòe ảnh do rung tay, đồng thời tăng cơ hội giảm tốc độ màn trập thêm 3 khẩu, tức là 8 lần, cho phép máy chụp trong các môi trường ánh l9Ll3. Makes a real difference. The 70-200 VR II has the best build quality I have ever seen. Its really built to take whatever you dish out and last. The F 2.8 speed is a bright enough lens to use a 1.4 or 2.0 teleconverter quite handily to give you 320 or 400 mm focal lengths. The F4 lens is a bit too slow for teleconverters. Nikon 18-200 f/2.8 VR II Sigma 18-200 f/2.8 VC Nikon 18-200 f/4 VRIII Used Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 AF-D. I think I'm learning towards the f/4, but I'm have a hard time deciding whether I'm better of just waiting until I can afford the VRII rather than settling. Nikon 200mm f/2 VR. Nikon 200mm f/2 VR. "Super-Chub" (2004-2010) Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200mm f/2D VR. It really looks like this! enlarge. It's usually about $2,900 used if you know How to Win at eBay. This all-content, junk-free website's biggest source of support is when you use those or any of these links to approved sources when you get anything I had the F mount Holy Trinity and then got the 24-70 f2.8E VR and the 70-200 f2.8E FL VR as well as a multitude of other top spec Nikon lenses like the 400 f2.8E FL VR etc. I have almost completely sold out of all F mount gear and am now wholly with Z mount with the Z7II and Z9 but have kept the 400 f2.8E FL VR, 500 f5.6 PF and the 105 f1.4E. Amazonian Toucanets. In late 2012 I decided to buy a 70-200mm f/2.8 lens and coupled it with my new D7100. My hope was that the sharpness and versatility would outmatch my 55-300mm mounted on my D5100. Regrettably, I was in budget mode and opted for the $800 Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di IF. Although brand new, it was an old design. For my next RV trip to Oregon, Washington coast and Cascades, I consider to take this lens along instead of the AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II to go lighter on walks. Near the vehicle, it goes together with the 200-500 for the long end. (this time, my AF-S 80-400 G and the AF-S 300 f/2.8 and TC's are planned to stay home on my lens board)

nikon 70 200 f2 8 vr ii weight